Kerman’s Korner–Be Prepared for Anything…And Don’t Lose Your Wallet


01315661Kerman’s Korner returns with a very special guest: Jonathan Schwartz from the law firm Goldberg Segalla!  Jonathan shares a story from early in his career where he had to deal with a lot of unexpected hurdles and think on his feet under pressure.  Listen here to this episode called “Be Prepared for Anything…And Don’t Lose Your Wallet”:

Special thanks to Jonathan for also letting Jeremy appear as a guest on his podcast, Timely Notice, to talk about recent developments with insurance coverage issues involved with Telephone Consumer Protection Act litigation.  You can listen to Jeremy’s appearance on Timely Notice on LinkedIn ( or Twitter (

A reminder: if you will be at the PLUS Conference in San Diego from November 7-9, be sure to stop by and hear Jeremy speak on The Building Blocks of Blockchain and a Bit on Bitcoin” on November 8 at 9:30 AM.   

Previous episodes of Kerman’s Korner can be found at: 

If you want to follow Jonathan’s lead and be a guest on Kerman’s Korner, please contact Jeremy at

Kerman’s Korner: Everything I Wanted . . . And So Much Less



Kerman’s Korner podcast has returned from a nice, long summer vacation.  In this episode, Jeremy shares a story about one of the trips he took this summer to do an oral argument in front of a state supreme court.  The argument didn’t go exactly as he had planned…

Here is the link to the episode:

Previous episodes of Kerman’s Korner can be found at:

WWM Wins Dismissal of Coverage Case Arising From TCPA Class Action

On April 30, 2018, WWM attorneys Ed Gibbons, Arthur McColgan, and Jeremy Kerman won a motion to dismiss on behalf of WWM client ACE American Insurance Co., in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Flores v. ACE American Ins. Co., No. 1:17-CV-08674.  (Click here for order.)

In an underlying suit, Plaintiff Victoria Flores filed a class action lawsuit against ACE’s insured – Grubhub. The complaint alleged that Grubhub violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) by sending unauthorized text messages to thousands of consumers. Eventually, Flores and Grubhub entered into a Settlement Agreement which provided for an $8 million consent judgment. As part of the settlement, Grubhub assigned to Flores all claims and proceeds under the Grubhub insurance policy issued by ACE, and the parties agreed that the $8 million consent judgement would be paid only out of the proceeds of the Grubhub insurance policy with ACE.

Flores then brought a declaratory judgment action seeking to collect the stipulated $8 million judgment from ACE.

ACE moved to dismiss the action, arguing that, under the policy, two separate exclusions precluded coverage of the claims in the underlying suit. The first was an exclusion for all claims based on “unsolicited electronic dissemination of . . . communications by or on behalf of the Insured to multiple actual or prospective customers,” explicitly including actions brought under the TCPA. The second exclusion excluded claims based on any “violation of consumer protection laws.”

In response, Flores argued that the TCPA exclusion does not apply to the type of communication described in the complaint – individual text messages which were tailored to each customer based on restaurants they had ordered from. Instead, she argued that the exclusion applied to messages or phone calls transmitted or made en massei.e., to multiple recipients at once – as part of spam or mass marketing campaigns. Flores also argued that the “consumer protection law” exclusion did not apply because the TCPA can reasonably be interpreted to be a “privacy regulation.”

Ultimately, Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein agreed with ACE that both exclusions applied. Judge Hellerstein opined that Flores was trying to read requirements into the TCPA exclusion that simply were not there. He wrote: “there is nothing in [the TCPA exclusion] requiring that the text messages sent to the customers be identical or sent at the same time,” and found that the exclusion was unambiguous and clearly excluded coverage. Judge Hellerstein also found Flores’ argument regarding the “consumer protection law” exclusion unpersuasive, writing that a Privacy Regulation as defined in the Policy refers to laws associated with the “control and use” of personal data which require commercial entities collecting such data to adopt security measures to avoid identity theft. That is not the purpose of the TCPA, and thus it is not a privacy regulation. Accordingly, Judge Hellerstein granted ACE’s motion to dismiss.

WWM Partner Promotions

Geiger Kerman_1570-0055 1_LR (01572586xAE57E)

WWM is pleased to announce the promotion of Kyle T. Geiger and Jeremy D. Kerman to partner.

Kyle is a trial lawyer with nearly a decade of experience handling catastrophic injury and death claims. He has extensive experience in representing corporate and individual clients in defending products liability, negligence, premise liability, medical malpractice and other tort cases. He values identifying and managing risk for his clients at the earliest stages of litigation. Kyle grew up in the northern suburbs of Chicago and has resided in the City of Chicago since graduating from law school. In his free time, Kyle enjoys running, traveling, watching the Chicago Cubs and spending time with his Goldendoodle, Teddi.

Jeremy prides himself on being thorough, thoughtful, prompt, and persistent in his handling of insurance coverage and commercial litigation matters. Jeremy has handled hundreds of D&O, E&O, and cyber claims, and has represented clients in insurance arbitrations, as well as in federal and state court trials and mediations. Jeremy also founded the Kerman’s Korner podcast When not in the courtroom, Jeremy can be found on the softball field, poorly singing along to classic rock songs on the radio, or mapping out his next hiking excursion.